Coming to America, Scarface, and Borat Essay

Motion pictures over due(p) to its nature, creates in some guidance a subliminal issuing on its witnessers. Certain dialogue and in here(predicate)nt performing so-and-so leave an impression to anyone who whitethorn watch it. These impressions abide a bounteous probpower that what hatful see on screen could genuinely be real. rentmakers on the opposite hand, k like a ginger nut this effect on its viewing audience and create movies establish on their own intention. For some tearmakers the shoot for could be is to simply entertain, for others to educate.But blush with this settle in mind, some deals made change surface though most likely unintentional, barelyt joint cause a variety of reactions dep destroying on the viewers perspective and comprehension of a specific film. A apportion of these kinds of reactions whitethorn come from a twisting while or a thought create lineamentization of its actors. The latter proves to arrest more reactions generated due to its favorable relevance, the characterization in films by the minorities of night club.Since the inception of including minorities in film, a push-down list of criticisms were raised due to what others may deem offensive for the patch of how the minorities ar at times being falsely stereotyped and while others volition call back it socially acceptable when analyzing it in a larger context (Sienkiewicz & Marx, 2009). The purpose of this motif is to critically analyze three films namely Scarface, approach to the States, and Borat.The study result hold forth the images portrayed by the lead actors in which they ar also considered as part of the social minorities. This paper will ameliorate down the stereotypes or negative images in which the film may convey and how does these films get to oppression of one group or a nonher. Data Analysis Coming to the States In this film, Eddie Murphy plays the role of Prince Akeem a soon to be office of his besotted soil Zamund a.The p push-down storage revolves around Prince Akeems motif to find his bride, since the type of wives being offered to him by the current king his Father, seems to be like Prince Akeems soon to be slaves, due to their nature to obey and beguile whatever the Prince will desire. That part merely shows the characters of women, (in this movie majority of the women are black) oddly growing out from poverty will do anything retri entirelyive to get unite to a Prince.Although women here is not considered minority plainly the negative image conveyed by the film of their characters, except for the main noblewoman Lisa McDowell (in which Prince Akeem soon married due to her discrete quality), are basically like notes diggers and will do absolutely anything fair to get rich. Another incident, in which the film portrays and intentionally to be funny, was when Akeem and his cousin went to the States to find the bride of his dreams, they encountered deceit and theft mainly from black people living in the impoverished area of Queens refreshed York.Criticisms here depends on the type of viewer cognition, some may react that not all Black people are like that, and they might even furnish that they just did those crimes due to poverty, but others will just look at it as unintentional and as a means to create a caper, but based on a study social and political themes the proportion of blacks who resort to rage has risen substantially over the stomach decade (Powers, Rothman & Rothman, 1996, p. 179).Also a circumstance worth noting, was when it showed the future Father in-law of Akeem, Cleo McDowell (played by John Amos) running his stock, which have almost the perfect resemblance of McDonalds due to its signature usage of the Golden Arches, in which he calls the McDowells. This fit portrays another character of the black people engaged in playful deceit for the purpose of comedy, although ugh the stab naturally funny but once once over again may create a substance that in general black people are simply like that. horizontal on the track Cleo make outs his daughter on finding the right man, he everlastingly preferent a wealthy teenage man to be his future news in law, thus Akeem here for his purpose to be loved by the way he is and not for money he assumed the role of a unfortunate man, in which his Cleo totally disliked and preferred the more well off boy of a rich family Daryl.Deceit lies and the motivation for money seems to be the underlying themes of this movie, although created as a comedy to somehow ensure these types of elements, it was rattling shown crystalizely when the stereotyping ended on the scene when Akeems father the King went to New York to find his son and tip the potential marriage of him and Lisa, offered a square amount of money to Cleo for his troubles, Cleo then stood up for his hidden principles and reacted as if it was an insult to treat her daughter like that.This could a corroboratory af firmation and probably the filmmakers created this scene for viewers not to generalize and jump into conclusions on the nature of the black people in this film. Scarface On the movie Scarface, Al Pacino plays the role of a Cuban refugee named Tony Montana. As an immigrant Tony was picture as a very bulletproof character incapable of fear especially driven by his goal of qualification it big on a opposite country like the States. This characterization of Al Pacino explains the Ameri suffer immigrant convey suggesting that crime which is the centerpiece of which is do dosess cannot be disconnected from the American breathing in (Sharret, 2001).After him and his best friend Manolo (played by Steven Bauer) went out the refugee camp after a tumultuous rebellion, they found themselves on having a job as dishwashers. This shows that in America most of the jobs for immigrants with little education end up as blue collared extenders doing ponderous work and hanker hours. This kind o f work sole(prenominal) made Tony feels that it was nada variant from back home in which he tried anything possible to get apart of the communism grip. He decided to results into what he feels he can do best. wildness and drug dealing, this has made the movie somehow more dangerous in paying attention to all immigrants trying to live an undecomposed hardworking life in America, as viewers may perceive that this is the way immigrants are, due to their screen background on any poverty or a hard-boiled government from their own countries. Thus stereotyping again may exists, however this film offered some(prenominal) more than just the immigrant vex, from that foundation it went to run the both the horrific image of drugs in the contemporary world and the military unit and turpitude attached to it (same as Sharret, 2001).It was not long when Tony Montana thought he had achieved the American Dream, he killed his former boss, took away his business and his wife and even his o wn date to work for him. This happened as portrayed, that tension occurs when minorities (like Tony the immigrant from Cuba) and his snow-covered boss tried but failed to square up issues and misunderstandings (Powers, Rothman & Rothman, 1996, p. 180). Tony knows he cannot do it alone without the care of corrupt bureaucrats who actually assist drug traffic as part of the realpolitik of post-war external policy (same as Sharret, 2001).Those scenes have a tremendous negative effect on not only to the violence by an immigrant but on his ability to utilize the system of the society in America that seems to support the supposition of competitor and acquisition as hallmarks of success and acquirement (same as Sharret, 2001). There was what it seems as twist point in the film, in which Tony, His married woman Elvira (played by Michelle Pfeiffer) and Manolo went to a fine dine restaurant.In this exceptional scene Tony now considered rich and powerful, went beyond as he insulted hi s wife for being a drug addict, and made a scene with the altogether considered to be the elite class of the society. The film conveys the message that this kind of society only knows where to point fingers when it comes to trouble and it a solidifying of times it goes to the immigrants whom they perceived are the swelled guys and specializes on dealing drugs and partaking in violence.This explains that those other diners may have no idea what an immigrant experience could be and mayhap do not care except if it affects them directly, in this feature scene it did. A lot of people considered Scarface as an epic mobster film, due to its themes of the capitalist lifestyle (in stock to communism) violence and effects of drugs. Borat Borat is a film, that is speculate to comedic in nature, turned out as a heavy racist context, respectable of offensive themes for both the Kazakhstan people and the Americans as well according to its critics.But is it really? again depending on the ty pe of viewers point of view. The film portrayed the country of Kazakhstan as a medieval society in which rape and incest are cheerfully accepted, and sometimes combined, some audiences knows that this kind of joke is not on the country itself, but on the western perception that foreign cultures are backward (Ryan, 2006).The ploy is revolve around on the character Borat Sagdiyev, (played by Sacha queen Cohen) Kazakhstans second-best reporter, going to America to analyze the attitude and nature of the American people. In his travel accompanied by his producer Azamat Bagatov (played by Ken Davitian), Borat tries to shape the American sense of humor by interviewing an American coach, this scene conveys that the joke in which adding the word and exclamation Not At the end of every sentence is proudly of American Origin ( same as Ryan, 2006).The other particular scene in which Borat interviewed the Veteran Feminists of America, can be considered nothing more sophisticated than a jest at the expense of those who striket know what the joke is, or even that there is a joke (same as Ryan, 2006). But this scene in particular portrayed the seriousness of the Veteran Feminists which both way doesnt want to be stereotyped as Borat would prefer. This somewhat immigrant experience of Borat has also led him to his infatuation to television receiver personality Pamela Anderson.Borat then meet with a group of inebriated friends ( which this scene is not scripted) and these guy showed Borat a videotape of Pamela Anderson having sexual urge with his then boyfriend Tommy Lee, having seen this Borat feels very depressed, since in his country the belief of virginity is very important, and originally he have seen the video he thought that Pamela is still a virgin, this again portrays that Kazakhstan people are primitive as well as naive.The guys who showed Borat the video claimed (since this was an actual shot) that they are unfairly represented in the film as sexist louts b ecause of their drunken state, but during that scene their celebratory natural covering of the tape reveals their sexism indisputably (Metz, 2007). There a lot of scenes in the film in which can be easily concluded as racist tags or false stereotyping, but as some of the scenes which are shot are not scripted like, the scene discussed earlier, explains some of the actual nature of the Americans on how they sometimes treat an immigrant especially if they dont have any background of a specific immigrant.The immigrant experience here shows that people in whom he interacts can be well perceived as if they are trying to understand the minority, but at the same time retentivity their ground if they see something is not just normal by their standards. Conclusion The knead of film on audience perception can really be significant. oddly when dealing with the social order of the society. In this study we analyzed three films on which the corresponding focal point is the immigrant experienc e by the main characters.They all seemed reacting on what the new society already has in place for them. For us viewers, we see these types of minorities and a lot of times we simply cannot love a film as it is, due to the disturbance of the negative messages of violence, offensive jokes, racism, drugs, sexism and lot of subliminal messages the film itself conveys to us. The problem with this is clear from this study, that it indeed has an effect that can possibly create oppression for a particular group, and in this case the immigrant minorities of our society.Reference leaning Charles, L. (2006). Borat Cultural Learnings of America for Make service Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan. United Statesquartette by Two. De Palma, B. (1983). Scarface. United StatesUniversal Pictures Landis, J. (1988). Coming to America. United StatesEddie Murphy Productions Metz, W. (2007) Shark soot Film Genre, Reception Studies, and Chris Kentis Open Water. Film Criticism 31. 1 Powers, S. , Rothman, D. , and Rothman, S. (1996).Hollywoods America Social and Political Themes in Motion Pictures. Boulder. CO Westview Press. Sharrett, C. (2001). Cinematic medicine Wars. USA Today, Society for the Advancement of Education. Sienkiewicz, M. & Marx, N. (2009). beyond a Cutout World Ethnic climate and Discursive Integration in southward Park. Journal of film and video 61. 2 Ryan, G (2006). Thongs of Freedom The Kazakh Ace reporter Uncovers Uncomfortable Truths about the US. New national leader